HIV-1 drug-resistance patterns among patients on failing treatment in a large number of European countries.

  • HIV Clinical and Translational Research
December 01, 2010 By:
  • van de Vijver DA
  • Wensing AM
  • Asjo B
  • Bruckova M
  • Jorgensen LB
  • Camacho R
  • Horban A
  • Linka M
  • Lazanas M
  • Loveday C
  • MacRae E
  • Nielsen C
  • Paraskevis D
  • Poljak M
  • Puchhammer-Stockl E
  • Ruiz L
  • Schmit JC
  • Stanczak G
  • Stanojevic M
  • Vandamme AM
  • Vercauteren J
  • Zazzi M
  • Bacheler L
  • Lecocq P
  • Villacian J
  • Boucher CA.

BACKGROUND: Information about patterns of HIV-1 drug resistance among treatment-exposed patients is crucial for the development of novel effective drugs. Currently no system exists that monitors patterns of resistance in patients failing therapy. METHODS: The study included 1,988 HIV-1 sequences from patients experiencing therapy failure collected between 2000 and 2004 in 15 European countries. Genotypic resistance was interpreted using the ANRS algorithm. Phenotypic resistance was predicted using the Virco geno- to phenotype system. RESULTS: 80.7% of the sequences included at least one drug-resistance mutation. Mutations were found for NRTIs (73.5%), NNRTIs (48.5%), and protease inhibitors (35.8%). Ninety percent of sequences with genotypic resistance harbored M184V, M41L, K103N, D67N, and/or T215Y. Among NRTIs, resistance was most frequently predicted for lamivudine. About half of all sequences had reduced susceptibility for NNRTIs. Resistance to most boosted protease inhibitors was found in < 25%. No sequence had resistance to all currently available drugs. CONCLUSION: Levels of resistance among patients with therapy failure were high. The patterns of resistance reflect resistance to drugs available for a longer time. Fully suppressive regimens can be designed even for the most mutated HIV because boosted protease inhibitors have remained active against most circulating viruses and new drug classes have become available.

2010 Dec. Acta Dermatovenerol Alp Pannonica Adriat.19(4):3-9.
Other information