Adaptation of running pattern to the drop of standard cushioned shoes: A randomised controlled trial with a 6-month follow-up.

  • Sports Medicine Research Laboratory
August 01, 2017 By:
  • Malisoux L
  • Gette P
  • Chambon N
  • Urhausen A
  • Theisen D.

OBJECTIVES: While several cross-sectional studies have investigated the acute effects of shoe drop on running biomechanics, the long-term consequences are currently unknown. This study aimed to investigate if the drop of standard cushioned shoes induces specific adaptations in running technique over a six-month period in leisure-time runners. DESIGN: Double-blinded randomised controlled trial. METHODS: The participants (n=59) received a pair of shoes with a heel-to-toe drop of 10mm (D10), 6mm (D6) or 0mm (D0) and were followed-up regarding running training over 6 months or 500km, whichever came first. Spatio-temporal variables and kinematics (foot/ground, ankle and knee joint angles) were investigated while running at preferred speed on a treadmill before and after the follow-up. RESULTS: The participants ran 332+/-178km in the study shoes between pre- and post-tests. There was no shoe version by time interaction for any of the spatio-temporal variables nor for lower limb angles at initial ground contact. A small but significant shoe drop effect was found for knee abduction at mid-stance (p=0.032), as it decreased for the D0 version (-0.3+/-3.1 vs. -1.3+/-2.6 degrees ) while it increased for the D6 (0.3+/-2.7 vs. 1.3+/-3.1 degrees ) and D10 version (-0.2+/-3.2 vs. 0.5+/-3.1 degrees ). However, none of the pairwise comparisons was significant in the post-hoc analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Apart from knee abduction at mid-stance, no specific adaptation in spatio-temporal variables and kinematics was found between the three shoe versions during this 6-month follow-up. Thus, shoe drop of standard cushioned shoes does not seem to influence running biomechanics in the long term.

2017 Aug. J Sci Med Sport.20(8):734-739. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
Other information