A critical evaluation of the PAXgene tissue fixation system: Morphology, immunohistochemistry, molecular biology, and proteomics.

  • Integrated BioBank of Luxembourg
July 08, 2016 By:
  • Mathieson W
  • Marcon N
  • Antunes L
  • Ashford DA
  • Betsou F
  • Frasquilho SG
  • Kofanova OA
  • McKay SC
  • Pericleous S
  • Smith C
  • Unger KM
  • Zeller C
  • Thomas GA.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the PAXgene tissue fixation system. METHODS: Clinical biospecimens (n = 46) were divided into PAXgene-fixed paraffin-embedded (PFPE), formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE), and fresh-frozen (FF) blocks. PFPE and FFPE sections were compared for histology (H&E staining) and immunohistochemistry (14 antibodies) using tissue microarrays. PFPE, FFPE, and FF samples were compared in terms of RNA quality (RNA integrity number, polymerase chain reaction [PCR] amplicon length, and quantitative reverse transcription PCR), DNA quality (gel electrophoresis and methylation profiling) and protein quality (liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry [LC-MS/MS]). RESULTS: PFPE protocol optimization was required in most cases and is described. RNA extracted from PFPE sections was considerably less degraded than that from FFPE sections but more degraded than that from FF blocks. Genomic-length DNA was extracted from PFPE and FF biospecimens, and methylation profiling showed PFPE and FF biospecimens to be almost indistinguishable. Only degraded DNA was extracted from FFPE biospecimens. PFPE sections yielded peptides that were slightly less amenable to LC-MS/MS analysis than FFPE sections, but FF gave slightly better results. CONCLUSIONS: While it cannot be envisaged that PAXgene will replace formalin in a routine clinical setting, for specific projects or immunodiagnostics involving biospecimens destined for immunohistochemical or histologic staining and DNA or RNA analyses, PAXgene is a viable option.

2016 Jul. Am J Clin Pathol.146(1):25-40.
Other information